What Are My Options If My Builder Does Not Agree to Fix Inspection Items?
- ClearScope Building Inspections

- Feb 15
- 6 min read
Updated: Mar 23
Building a new home involves many stages, many trades, and many technical details. During this process, it is not unusual for an independent inspection report to include observations that the builder may not immediately agree with. When this happens, it does not automatically mean something has gone wrong. In many cases, it simply reflects that construction work is being reviewed from different professional perspectives.
Many homeowners are surprised when items are noted during inspections, but this is a normal part of the construction process — you can read more in our guide on whether it’s normal to find defects during a new home inspection.
Understanding how these situations are normally handled can help homeowners respond calmly and keep the build moving forward in a practical and organised way, whether the discussion arises after a frame stage inspection, a lock up stage inspection, a fix stage inspection, or even close to the PCI or handover inspection.
Why builders and inspectors may sometimes see things differently
Residential construction relies on drawings, engineering details, specifications, tolerances, manufacturer instructions, and building standards. Interpreting how these apply on a live building site can sometimes involve professional judgement.
An independent inspector reviews the work at a particular moment in time, based on what is visible and accessible at that stage. For example, during a frame stage inspection the focus is on structure and alignment, while at lock up stage the attention shifts toward external completion, windows, roofing installation, and weatherproofing. By the time of a fix stage inspection, internal linings and services installation change what can realistically be seen.
The builder, on the other hand, understands how the project is programmed, what works are still to occur, and how certain details may be completed in later stages.
Because of this, an inspector may raise an observation that appears incomplete, while the builder may consider the item still part of ongoing works. In other situations, both professionals may simply interpret a drawing note or installation detail slightly differently. This can occasionally occur with technical areas such as roofing defects, where sequencing, flashing installation stages, or manufacturer methods may still be progressing.
These kinds of differences are generally part of the normal review process rather than a sign of conflict.

How most inspection findings are resolved through discussion
In practice, the majority of inspection observations are clarified through straightforward communication.
Often, once the builder reviews the inspection report, they may:
confirm the item will be addressed in an upcoming stage
explain how the work already complies with the plans or specifications
provide additional documentation or product information
arrange for a minor adjustment if required
For instance, something noted at lock up stage may be scheduled for completion during fix stage, or a detail raised earlier may simply require confirmation of the intended final installation method.
Construction projects involve many small technical details, and open discussion usually resolves questions quickly.
For homeowners, it can be helpful to view inspection reports as part of an ongoing conversation about the build, rather than a final determination that something must immediately change.
If disagreements arise, many homeowners refer back to guidance within Lock Up Stage Defects in New Homes: What Inspectors Commonly Find Before Internal Works Begin to understand their position.
Referring back to plans, specifications, and contract documents
When an item is questioned, the most reliable reference point is always the project documentation.
This normally includes:
architectural drawings
engineering drawings
building specifications
product installation requirements
the signed building contract
These documents define what has actually been agreed to be built.
If an observation is raised in an inspection report, checking it against the approved drawings and specifications often provides clarity. Sometimes the drawing will show the builder’s approach is correct. In other cases, it may confirm that an adjustment is appropriate.
Keeping the focus on documented requirements helps keep discussions objective and centred on the agreed design rather than personal opinion.
Disagreements sometimes occur when homeowners raise smaller workmanship concerns. For example, visible gaps around door frames may appear minor but can still indicate installation issues that require rectification. Our article Gaps Around Door Frames in New Homes — Are They a Defect? explains how these defects are assessed during building inspections.
Communicating inspection observations calmly and clearly
If a homeowner wishes to raise inspection findings with their builder, a calm and structured approach usually works best.
A practical method is to:
send the report to the builder in full
highlight the specific items you would like clarification on
ask for their written response or explanation
This keeps communication clear and avoids misunderstandings.
It can also help to remember that construction schedules are tightly coordinated. Builders often manage multiple trades and delivery timelines, so allowing reasonable time for review and response supports smoother resolution.
Maintaining a cooperative tone helps keep discussions focused on the shared goal of completing the home according to the agreed documents.
Why some items may be addressed later in construction
Not every observation raised during an inspection needs to be corrected immediately.
Some building elements are completed progressively. For example:
finishing trims may be installed after other works are complete
sealing or adjustments may occur during final fit-off
external grading or drainage details may be finalised after landscaping preparation
cosmetic items are often reviewed closer to the PCI or handover inspection
Because construction occurs in sequence, what appears unfinished at one stage may simply be awaiting the next scheduled trade. Something noted during frame stage may not be fully resolved until lock up, and certain internal items raised at lock up may not be completed until fix stage.
Builders will often advise whether an item is programmed for completion later in the process. Understanding this sequencing can help homeowners avoid unnecessary concern about work that is still in progress.
In some cases, there may be differing views on whether a paint issue requires rectification, particularly where standards and tolerances are involved. Situations like these are explored further in Paint Defects in New Homes: What Should Be Fixed Before Handover in Melbourne, which outlines how these defects are typically assessed at PCI stage.

When clarification from the building surveyor or certifier may help
If there is uncertainty about how a technical requirement should be interpreted, the building surveyor or certifier may sometimes provide clarification.
Their role typically includes confirming that the work meets applicable building regulations and approved documentation. Where a question relates to compliance with the approved permit drawings or regulatory requirements, their input can help clarify the correct approach.
This step is usually only needed for specific technical questions rather than general construction matters, but it can be useful where interpretation of compliance requirements is involved.
The value of keeping written communication
Clear written communication is one of the most helpful tools during construction.
Keeping records of:
inspection reports
builder responses
emails discussing specific items
any agreed adjustments
creates a simple reference history showing how questions were resolved.
This documentation helps everyone track what has been discussed and what outcomes were agreed. It also reduces the chance of confusion later in the build, particularly as different trades move through the project.
Organised communication supports continuity and keeps the process transparent for all parties.
How staged inspections provide ongoing context
Independent inspections are usually carried out at several points during construction, such as the frame stage inspection, lock up stage inspection, fix stage inspection, and finally the PCI or handover inspection.
Each stage builds on the previous one. Earlier observations help explain what was visible at that time, while later inspections confirm how the work has progressed or been finalised.
Because construction evolves over time, a single inspection rarely tells the whole story. Instead, staged reviews create a continuous record of the building process as it unfolds. This staged approach is commonly explained within broader guidance about New Build Inspections Melbourne, where the emphasis is on understanding construction sequencing rather than simply identifying isolated issues.
When an item raised at one stage is discussed and resolved, later inspections often show how that detail was ultimately completed within the finished structure.
A normal part of the building process
When a builder does not immediately agree with an inspection observation, this is usually best understood as part of the normal communication process within residential construction.
Different professionals may review the same detail from slightly different perspectives, particularly while work is still underway. In most situations, referring back to the drawings, discussing the item clearly, and allowing for construction sequencing leads to a practical resolution.
For homeowners, the options if a builder does not agree to fix items should start with focusing on documentation, calm communication, and the staged nature of the build helps keep the project moving forward constructively.
Viewed this way, inspection reports are not about creating disagreement, but about supporting understanding of how the home is being built step by step.



Comments